Navigating the Journal Publication Process: A Step-by-Step Guide for Researchers
- Rockwood Medical Writing Agency
- Jul 12
- 4 min read
Updated: Jul 20

Publishing in a peer-reviewed journal is a critical step in the research process. It allows your findings to be shared, scrutinised, cited, and built upon by the wider scientific and clinical community. However, for many researchers, especially those publishing for the first time, the journal submission process can feel opaque, complex, and time-consuming.
In this guide, we walk through the key stages of the publication process, offering practical tips to help you prepare your manuscript, choose the right journal, and respond effectively to reviewer feedback.
1. Plan for Journal Publication Early
Successful publication begins well before the writing stage. From the moment you design your study or initiate data collection, keep the eventual manuscript in mind. This includes:
Identifying the likely audience for your research
Considering the type of article (e.g., original research, review, case report)
Maintaining detailed records and pre-specifying your methodology
Ensuring ethical approval and data transparency
By planning with publication in mind, you avoid many of the delays and pitfalls that arise later.
2. Choose the Right Journal
Selecting the right journal is one of the most important decisions in the process. Factors to consider include:
Scope and readership: Does the journal regularly publish research like yours?
Impact factor and indexing: Consider visibility, but balance this with relevance and acceptance likelihood
Open access vs subscription: Consider funder requirements and article processing charges (APCs)
Turnaround times: Some journals are faster than others, especially for clinical research or case reports
Study recent articles in your target journal to understand its preferred style, structure, and level of detail.
3. Prepare a Structured Manuscript
Most scientific journals follow the IMRaD structure: Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion. Write with clarity, brevity, and objectivity. Key tips:
Follow the journal’s author guidelines precisely — from formatting to reference style
Ensure your abstract is concise and accurately reflects your findings
Use subheadings, figures, and tables to support readability
Acknowledge limitations transparently
Include all required statements (e.g., ethics, funding, conflict of interest)
Avoid unnecessary jargon and write for an informed but non-specialist reader.
4. Prepare Supporting Documents
Beyond the main manuscript, you will usually need to submit:
A cover letter: Briefly explain the significance of your work and why it is suitable for the journal
Figures and tables: Often uploaded separately in specific formats
Supplementary data: Detailed tables, protocols, or datasets
Author contribution and disclosure forms
Ethics and trial registration statements (if applicable)
Many journals use online submission portals that require each document to be uploaded individually. Prepare these ahead of time to avoid delays.
5. Submit and Track Your Manuscript
Once submitted, the journal will conduct an initial editorial screening. Your manuscript may be desk-rejected if it is outside scope, poorly formatted, or lacks novelty.
If it passes, it moves to peer review — typically involving two or more independent reviewers. This process can take weeks or months, depending on the journal and complexity.
You can usually track the progress via the submission portal. Be patient but proactive — a polite enquiry is acceptable if your manuscript has been under review for more than three months with no update.
6. Responding to Reviewer Comments
Reviewer feedback is a central part of the scientific process. A decision letter will usually recommend:
Accept (rare on first submission)
Minor revisions
Major revisions
Reject with resubmission option
Reject outright
If revisions are invited:
Address every point methodically, even if you disagree
Include a point-by-point response letter, quoting each comment and detailing your changes
Highlight changes in the revised manuscript (tracked changes or coloured text)
Remain professional and courteous in your tone, even when addressing critical feedback
This stage can significantly improve the quality of your manuscript and is often iterative.
7. After Acceptance: What to Expect
Once accepted:
The manuscript moves into production for typesetting and proofreading
You will receive page proofs to check for errors or formatting issues
Your article will be published online, often ahead of print
Many journals now offer post-publication promotion via social media, email digests, or press releases. Consider sharing your work across your professional networks, institutional website, or platforms like ResearchGate or LinkedIn.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Submitting to the wrong journal or ignoring formatting guidelines
Incomplete or unclear methods and statistical reporting
Poor-quality or unlabelled figures and tables
Failure to respond constructively to reviewer feedback
Not disclosing conflicts of interest or funding sources
Overstating findings or making unsupported conclusions
How Medical Writers Can Help
Navigating the journal publication process is not always straightforward — especially when managing clinical workloads, multiple authors, or regulatory expectations. Professional medical writers can support:
Manuscript drafting and editing
Journal selection and formatting
Cover letter preparation
Literature review integration
Reviewer response letters
Compliance with GPP, ICMJE, or CONSORT guidelines
This support can save time, improve manuscript quality, and increase the likelihood of acceptance.
Conclusion
Publishing in a peer-reviewed journal is both an achievement and a contribution to medical progress. By understanding the steps involved and approaching each with clarity, strategy, and attention to detail, you maximise your impact and credibility.
If you need expert support preparing or submitting your manuscript, our medical writing team is here to help.
Contact us today for tailored publication support.
Comments