Knowing when to revise, when to defend your work, and when to withdraw is a skill that grows with experience. The decision is rarely straightforward, but it should always be informed by the quality of the research, the integrity of the findings, and the long-term goals for publication.

Responding to reviewer comments is a central part of scientific publishing. While the process can be challenging, it is also a valuable opportunity to refine your work and demonstrate professionalism.

The peer review process is a cornerstone of modern science. It ensures that the body of published research remains reliable, credible, and of high value to the scientific community. While it can feel daunting to early-career researchers, it is also an essential pathway to professional growth.

Submitting a manuscript to a scientific journal can feel like launching a ship into a vast sea of publications. The cover letter that...

Publishing is not only about dissemination but about dialogue. The right journal connects your work to a wider community, shapes how it is interpreted, and influences how it is built upon. Take time to choose carefully. A well-informed choice at the start can save considerable time and effort later.

Submitting a manuscript to a peer-reviewed journal is a major milestone in the research journey. It represents months, sometimes years,...

Publishing in a peer-reviewed journal is both an achievement and a contribution to medical progress. By understanding the steps involved and approaching each with clarity, strategy, and attention to detail, you maximise your impact and credibility.